Chapter 8 of 10

From: Literature Without a Liter of Tears

Chapter 8. "War and Peace": How to Survive Four Volumes and Learn to Love It

Let's start with the main thing: "War and Peace" is not a book. It's an entire universe. Four volumes, more than five hundred characters, two wars, several love stories, philosophical digressions the size of a separate novella—and Napoleon, whom Tolstoy hates with such sincere consistency that it's almost touching.

The advice to "read War and Peace" sounds like a suggestion to run a marathon: technically possible, but requires an explanation—why? And here I want to say something important: this book is genuinely interesting. Not "interesting for a classic," not "interesting if you're a literature major," but simply interesting. There's love, betrayal, war, death, friendship, mistakes that can't be undone, and people trying to understand why they're alive at all.

The problem is that Tolstoy didn't know how to write briefly. At all. If he lived today and ran a Telegram channel, every post would be dissertation-length. But that doesn't mean reading him is impossible—you just need to know how to approach this monster.

So, let's dive in.

***

The story begins in 1805, in Anna Pavlovna Scherer's salon. It's one of those high-society evenings where rich and influential people come to talk about nothing. Literally the first pages of the novel show people discussing Napoleon, war, politics, but no one is listening to anyone, everyone speaks in rehearsed phrases, and the whole conversation is theater.

From the very first lines, Tolstoy shows us: here is the world our heroes live in. A world of falseness, conventions, empty chatter. And against this backdrop, two people appear who stand out from the general picture.

The first is Pierre Bezukhov. A huge, awkward young man in glasses, the illegitimate son of the wealthy Count Bezukhov. He's just returned from abroad, says the wrong things, doesn't understand social rules, and generally looks like someone who accidentally walked into the wrong party.

The second is Prince Andrei Bolkonsky. Handsome, intelligent, cold. He has everything: a title, money, a pregnant wife, a brilliant career ahead. And yet he's bored. Not just bored—he's suffocating from this life. When Pierre asks him, "Why are you going to war?" Andrei says something about duty and honor, but the real reason is simple—he hopes war will give him the meaning that's missing from peaceful life.

These two men are the center of the novel. Tolstoy will follow them for fifteen years, through two wars, through love and loss, through rises and falls. And both of them—each in his own way—are searching for the answer to the same question: why do I live?

***

Pierre Bezukhov is a character you don't fall in love with right away. At first, he seems like just an awkward good-natured fellow. Fat, nearsighted, socially clumsy. He doesn't know what he wants from life, easily falls under others' influence, and the first major decision he makes—marrying Hélène Kuragina—turns out to be a catastrophe.

Hélène is perhaps the coldest character in the novel. Beautiful as a marble statue, and just as unfeeling. She marries Pierre for his money (by this point he's already inherited his father's enormous fortune), and their marriage isn't a union of two people but a transaction. Pierre tries for a while to convince himself that he loves his wife, but it's self-deception, and he knows it.

And then the duel happens. Dolokhov, a family friend (and, as it turns out, Hélène's lover), publicly humiliates Pierre at a dinner. Pierre challenges him to a duel—though he's never fired a pistol in his life. And here something interesting happens: Pierre, who can't shoot at all, hits Dolokhov. And the experienced duelist Dolokhov misses.

This is the first moment in the novel when it becomes clear: Tolstoy doesn't believe in logic and predictability. Life is unpredictable. Chance decides more than skill or calculation. This idea will repeat again and again, especially when it comes to war.

After the duel, Pierre separates from Hélène and begins searching for the meaning of life. He joins a Masonic lodge—because the Masons promise him spiritual brotherhood and a higher purpose. He tries to free his serfs—because it seems right to him. He travels, reads, thinks. And still doesn't find what he's looking for.

Pierre is a person who constantly makes mistakes. He trusts the wrong people, makes the wrong decisions, follows false paths. But he doesn't give up. He keeps searching. And that's his strength.

If we compare to modern times, Pierre is a person in a midlife crisis, except his crisis begins in his early twenties. He tries different things—business, spiritual practices, charity—and finds satisfaction in none of them. Sound familiar? How many people today rush between career and self-improvement, between money and meaning, between what others want and what they want themselves.

***

Andrei Bolkonsky is Pierre's complete opposite. If Pierre is chaos, then Andrei is order. He knows exactly what he wants (glory), he's competent, he keeps himself in check. He despises high society but knows how to exist within it. He's cold toward his wife, whom he doesn't love, but fulfills his duty.

Andrei goes to war against Napoleon in 1805. He dreams of his Toulon—a moment of glory when he'll perform a heroic deed and everyone will recognize him. And such a moment comes: at the Battle of Austerlitz, Andrei grabs a fallen banner and leads soldiers into attack.

And here a key scene of the novel occurs. Andrei is wounded. He falls on his back and sees the sky above him. Infinite, high, indifferent sky. And in this moment he understands: everything he strived for—glory, recognition, career—is trivial. It's nothing compared to this sky, to this infinity.

"How quiet, peaceful, and solemn," thinks Andrei. "How is it I didn't see this lofty sky before? And how happy I am to have found it at last. Yes! All is vanity, all is delusion, except this infinite sky."

This is a moment of revelation. Andrei lies on the battlefield, Napoleon passes nearby—the very one Andrei wanted to be like—and looks at him. And Andrei no longer cares. Napoleon seems small, insignificant against this sky.

Andrei survives but returns home a different person. He no longer wants glory. He settles in the country, manages the estate, raises his son (his wife died in childbirth). He thinks he's found peace. But it's an illusion—Andrei is simply running away from life.

***

And now—Natasha Rostova. She appears in the novel as a thirteen-year-old girl who bursts into a room full of adults in the middle of an important conversation because she wants to sing. This first appearance perfectly characterizes Natasha: she lives by her feelings, she doesn't think about propriety, she is life itself.

Natasha grows up before our eyes. She falls in love—passionately, truly—first with Boris Drubetskoy, then with Andrei Bolkonsky, then—and this is her biggest mistake—with Anatole Kuragin.

The story with Anatole is a tragedy of foolishness and youth. Natasha is already engaged to Andrei, who has gone abroad for a year at his father's demand. She loves Andrei. But he's far away, and Anatole is here, handsome, charming, saying beautiful words. Anatole is an empty shell and a scoundrel, but Natasha doesn't see it. She agrees to elope with him, not knowing that he's already married.

The elopement falls through at the last moment. Scandal. Disgrace. Natasha tries to poison herself. Andrei breaks off the engagement.

This is one of the most painful episodes in the novel, because it's impossible to hate Natasha. She made a terrible mistake, but it's a mistake of youth, loneliness, naivety. She didn't understand what she was doing. And she pays for it in full.

Tolstoy loves his characters, even when they make mistakes. He doesn't judge Natasha—he shows how easily a person can lose their way when left alone.

***

Now let's talk about war. Because the novel is called "War and Peace," and war occupies a huge place in it.

Tolstoy fought himself—he participated in the defense of Sevastopol during the Crimean War, saw death up close, knew what trenches, cold, and fear were like. And he wrote about war as no one had before him: without heroism, without pathos, without glorious feats.

War in the novel is chaos. No one understands what's happening. Orders don't arrive or arrive late. Generals don't know where their units are. Soldiers don't see the big picture. An individual's bravery or cowardice barely affects the outcome of battle.

Take the Battle of Borodino—the central episode of the 1812 war in the novel. Tolstoy describes it through Pierre's eyes, who came to the battlefield as a tourist, to watch. And what does Pierre see? Mud, blood, smoke, incomprehensible commands, people dying without any sense. He doesn't understand who's winning. He sees no order. He sees only horror.

And then Tolstoy explains: this is what war actually looks like. All those stories about brilliant commanders who win battles through clever maneuvers—that's a myth. In practice, the commander doesn't control the battle. He gives orders that get distorted in transmission, delayed, not executed. The outcome is decided not by strategy but by a thousand accidents: who got tired, who got scared, who happened to be in the right place at the right time.

In this context, it becomes clear why Tolstoy hates Napoleon so much. Not because Napoleon is the enemy. But because Napoleon is a symbol of the idea of the great man who makes history. Tolstoy considers this a lie. History is a current in which everyone floats: emperors and peasants alike. No one controls this current.

***

Kutuzov, on the other hand, is Tolstoy's favorite character among the military commanders. And he loves him precisely for what he criticizes in others: Kutuzov doesn't try to command.

Seriously. If you read the novel carefully, Kutuzov is a strange commander-in-chief. He falls asleep during war councils. He doesn't give clear orders. He seems to be waiting for something, allowing events to develop on their own.

And this is exactly what Tolstoy considers wisdom. Kutuzov understands what Napoleon doesn't: war is an elemental force, and it's impossible to control it. You can only sense the army's mood, understand when soldiers are ready to fight and when they're tired. Kutuzov doesn't command—he feels.

Before the Battle of Borodino, all the generals propose clever plans. Kutuzov listens, nods, and then does it his own way: simply lines up the army and gives battle. Without tricks. Because he knows: in a real battle, all plans fall apart.

After Borodino, Kutuzov makes a decision for which his contemporaries hated him and historians praise him: he surrenders Moscow. Without a fight. The French enter the capital, and the Russian army retreats.

This looks like defeat, but Tolstoy shows: it's a victory. Napoleon took an empty city. No one to conquer. No one to surrender. The residents have left. Moscow is burning. The French army loots houses, loses discipline, and winter approaches. Kutuzov simply waits for the enemy to destroy itself.

That's why Kutuzov is an antihero in the good sense. He doesn't perform heroic deeds. He doesn't lead troops into attack on a white horse. He's an old, sick, one-eyed man who understands the main thing: sometimes the best strategy is to do nothing.

***

And while armies fight, Pierre undergoes his own transformation. After Borodino, he's taken prisoner by the French and there meets Platon Karataev—a simple peasant, a soldier.

Platoon is perhaps the strangest character in the novel. He's uneducated, speaks in proverbs, lives one day at a time. He doesn't ask questions about the meaning of life because for him life itself is the answer. He accepts everything: captivity, hunger, cold. He's not angry at anyone. He simply lives.

Pierre, who all his life sought meaning in books, in philosophy, in Masonry, suddenly finds it in conversation with an illiterate peasant. Platon doesn't teach him deliberately—he simply exists. And that's enough.

"He loved listening to Platon Karataev," writes Tolstoy, "because he was growing closer to him, and through him was discovering something new."

What exactly does Pierre discover? That happiness isn't in achievements. That meaning isn't in great goals. That you can be happy right now, in any circumstances, if you accept life as it is.

This sounds like a platitude, but for Pierre it's a revelation. All his life he chased something: recognition, truth, love. And now, in captivity, hungry and cold, he suddenly feels peace. Because he stopped chasing.

***

Parallel to Pierre, Andrei also changes. After breaking up with Natasha, he goes to war again—in 1812, when Napoleon invades Russia. Andrei commands a regiment, he's a good officer, his soldiers respect him. But inside he's empty. He hasn't forgiven Natasha. He hasn't forgiven himself. He thinks of death as liberation.

And death comes. On the Borodino field, Andrei is wounded by a grenade fragment. The wound is serious but not fatal—if he had been operated on in time. But this is war, and he's transported in a wagon train with other wounded, in the mud and chaos of the retreat.

In this wagon train, Andrei meets Anatole Kuragin—the very one because of whom his engagement to Natasha was destroyed. Anatole has just had his leg amputated. He cries like a child. And Andrei, who hated this man for so many years, suddenly feels pity for him. Not even forgiveness—just pity. Anatole is no longer an enemy. He's just an unhappy person.

"Compassion, love for our brothers, for those who love us, love for those who hate us, love for our enemies—yes, that love which God preached on earth," thinks Andrei.

This is Andrei's second revelation. The first was under the sky of Austerlitz—when he understood the insignificance of glory. The second—in the wagon train with the wounded—when he understood the power of love.

But Andrei dies. Slowly, over several weeks. By his side is Natasha, who found him in the retreating army and cares for him. They reconcile. Andrei forgives her. And then quietly passes away.

Andrei's death is one of the hardest scenes in the novel. Not because it's dramatic—quite the opposite. It's quiet. Andrei simply falls asleep and doesn't wake up. Tolstoy doesn't make a tragedy of it. Death is part of life. Andrei found his peace.

***

And what about Natasha? After Andrei's death, she's ill for a long time—not physically, but spiritually. She can't recover from the loss. And here religion appears: Natasha begins going to church, praying, and this gives her the strength to go on living.

In the novel's epilogue—set several years after the war—Natasha is married to Pierre. They're happy. They have children. Natasha has become different: no longer that sparkling girl who burst into rooms. She's gained weight, she's completely absorbed in family, she doesn't think about balls and dresses.

Many readers find this disappointing. Where did the old Natasha go? Tolstoy killed her vivacity! But Tolstoy didn't think so. For him, the Natasha of the epilogue is a Natasha who has found her purpose. She no longer rushes about. She loves and is loved. She's in her place.

One can argue whether this interpretation is right. Tolstoy was a man of his time and believed that a woman's highest purpose was family. Today this sounds limited. But if we set aside the gender question, the idea goes deeper: happiness isn't in eternal searching, but in finding your place and stopping.

***

Pierre in the epilogue has also changed. He no longer rushes about. He's found himself—in family, in managing the estate, in some political circles (which Tolstoy describes vaguely but hints at the Decembrists). Pierre is still awkward, still enthusiastic, but now he has a foundation: Natasha and children.

"Family is everything," Tolstoy seems to say with the novel's ending. After all the wars, after all the searching, after all the mistakes—family.

Again, one can argue. Not everyone finds happiness in family. Not everyone wants a family. But for Tolstoy's heroes—and, apparently, for Tolstoy himself—this was the answer.

***

Now let's talk about what people usually don't discuss: the philosophical digressions.

"War and Peace" isn't just a novel. It's a novel with essays. Tolstoy constantly interrupts the narrative to reflect on the nature of history, on free will, on why historians are wrong. These digressions take up dozens of pages. They're dense, sometimes tedious, sometimes brilliant.

What should you do with them?

The honest answer: you can skip them. Seriously. If you're reading the novel for the first time and want to know what happens to the characters—skip the philosophical chapters. The plot won't suffer.

But if you're interested in understanding exactly what Tolstoy is trying to say about the world—read them. Because there are important ideas there.

Tolstoy's main idea: history isn't the result of great men's actions. Napoleon didn't conquer Europe because he was a genius. He simply rode the crest of a wave he didn't control. If not him—it would have been someone else.

This is counterintuitive. We're used to thinking that leaders change the world. Tolstoy says: no. The world changes on its own, and leaders only think they're controlling the process.

Another important thought: freedom and necessity are two sides of the same coin. We feel free when we make decisions. But in hindsight, we see that all our decisions were predetermined by circumstances. This is a paradox that Tolstoy doesn't resolve—he simply states it.

And a third thought, connected to the previous ones: an individual person decides very little. The fate of war is determined not by Napoleon or Kutuzov, but by the mood of millions of people. When Russian soldiers want to fight—they win. When the French are tired and want to go home—they lose. Generals only voice what has already ripened in the army.

You can disagree with Tolstoy. You can think he exaggerates. But these thoughts are worth hearing—if only to make you think.

***

Now a practical question: how do you read "War and Peace" and not die?

Here are several strategies.

First: read in parts. Don't try to devour the novel in a week. This is a marathon, not a sprint. Read a chapter or two a day. The novel isn't going anywhere.

Second: follow the three main storylines. These are Pierre, Andrei, and the Rostovs. Everything else is background. When you get lost among characters (and there are many), return to these three.

Third: don't be afraid to skip. If a scene seems boring—flip ahead. If a philosophical chapter is incomprehensible—skip it. You can always come back later.

Fourth: keep a list of characters handy. There are plenty of such lists online with brief descriptions. This isn't cheating—it's a necessity. Tolstoy introduced five hundred people into the novel and expected the reader to remember them. This was unrealistic even in the nineteenth century.

Fifth: treat war and peace as separate books. Military scenes are one thing: chaos, death, philosophy of history. Peaceful scenes are another: love, balls, family dramas. If one type of scene tires you—switch to the other.

And sixth, most important: read for pleasure, not to check a box. If after a hundred pages you understand this isn't for you—you have every right to stop. Classics aren't an exam. But give the novel a chance. Many people get hooked after the first hundred pages, once the characters become familiar.

***

Finally—why is "War and Peace" still relevant today?

Because the questions Pierre and Andrei ask haven't gone anywhere. Why do I live? What makes life meaningful? How do I find my place?

Because war hasn't changed. Chaos, fear, chance—all of this exists in any conflict. Tolstoy described war so honestly that military people still study these pages.

Because people haven't changed. Natasha is everyone who made mistakes in their youth. Andrei is everyone who thought success would bring happiness and discovered emptiness. Pierre is everyone who searched for meaning and didn't know where to look.

And because the novel's ending is reconciliation. After all the losses, after all the mistakes, after the war—life continues. People marry, have children, build homes. This isn't weakness or capitulation. It's courage—to keep living after everything.

***

If you have no time at all:

"War and Peace" is an epic about three people: Pierre (an awkward rich man searching for the meaning of life), Andrei (a handsome aristocrat with depression), and Natasha (a vivacious girl who grows up through mistakes).

Everything happens against the backdrop of the war with Napoleon from 1805 to 1812. Tolstoy shows war without heroism: chaos, chance, no one controls anything. Kutuzov is wise because he doesn't try to control the elemental force.

Andrei dies from his wounds, having forgiven everyone. Pierre finds meaning in captivity, talking to a simple peasant. In the finale, Pierre and Natasha are married and happy.

The main idea: happiness isn't in glory or achievements, but in love and acceptance of life.

The key quote—about the sky at Austerlitz:

"How quiet, peaceful, and solemn… And how happy I am to have found it at last. Yes! All is vanity, all is delusion, except this infinite sky."

And a practical tip: read in parts, follow Pierre-Andrei-Natasha, you can skip the philosophical chapters.

Content protection active. Copying and right-click are disabled.
1x

"Start telling the stories that only you can tell." — Neil Gaiman